Loshchilov and Hutter (2016) — ARXIV-1608.03983
Standing in the anthology
Retired as a duplicate rather than for anything about the work.
LIT-042 carries the reading, the supersession by LIT-035, and the schedule chain that runs from warm restarts through single-cycle cosine to WSD.
The pair made the record say two things at once about one paper: this note
read Active and LIT-042 read Superseded, and both were correct about
their own document. Nothing in the anthology could hold both at once, which
is the argument for the check that would have caught it (luria#165) — a
paper has one standing, and two notes for it is a data error rather than a
difference of opinion.
Cited by nothing. The half of the pair that carried the judgement is the half
everything pointed at, which is why the duplication cost nothing beyond a
misleading Active row on the literature index.