David Marx

Narrative Control

5 min read

Narrative Control in Astroturfing Campaigns

Controlling the narrative is a crucial component of astroturfing campaigns. It involves shaping public discourse and perceptions by promoting specific messages and viewpoints while suppressing or discrediting opposing perspectives. The Koch brothers and their network of organizations effectively employed various strategies to control the narrative around key issues. Here’s an in-depth look at how they achieved this and its implications:

Key Strategies for Narrative Control

  1. Crafting and Disseminating Core Messages

    • Strategy: Develop clear, compelling, and consistent core messages that align with the campaign’s goals.
    • Tactics:
      • Message Framing: Frame issues in a way that resonates with the target audience’s values and beliefs (e.g., framing healthcare reform as government overreach).
      • Talking Points: Create and distribute talking points to ensure consistency across all communications and spokespeople.

  2. Leveraging Media Outlets

    • Strategy: Utilize media platforms to amplify the campaign’s core messages and reach a broad audience.
    • Tactics:
      • Op-Eds and Articles: Publish opinion pieces in prominent newspapers and online platforms to present the campaign’s viewpoints.
      • Media Appearances: Arrange for campaign spokespeople to appear on television, radio, and podcasts to discuss key issues and reinforce the narrative.
      • Press Releases: Issue press releases to provide journalists with ready-made content that aligns with the campaign’s narrative.

  3. Engaging Influencers and Thought Leaders

    • Strategy: Partner with influencers and thought leaders who can lend credibility and amplify the campaign’s narrative.
    • Tactics:
      • Endorsements: Secure endorsements from respected figures in academia, business, and politics.
      • Guest Contributions: Invite influencers to contribute articles, videos, or social media posts supporting the campaign’s goals.
      • Public Speaking Events: Arrange for thought leaders to speak at conferences, panels, and other public events to promote the campaign’s message.

  4. Utilizing Social Media Platforms

    • Strategy: Use social media to disseminate the campaign’s narrative quickly and engage with a broad audience.
    • Tactics:
      • Targeted Advertising: Run targeted ads on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to reach specific demographics.
      • Hashtag Campaigns: Create and promote hashtags to unify messages and encourage users to engage with and share content.
      • Viral Content: Develop shareable content, such as memes and videos, to increase visibility and engagement.

  5. Suppressing Opposing Viewpoints

    • Strategy: Undermine or discredit opposing perspectives to maintain control over the narrative.
    • Tactics:
      • Negative Campaigning: Launch negative campaigns that attack the credibility and motives of opponents.
      • Astroturfing Comments: Use fake accounts and paid commenters to flood online discussions with supportive messages and drown out opposing viewpoints.
      • Strategic Disinformation: Spread misleading or false information to confuse or distract from opposing arguments.

  6. Creating and Promoting Research and Reports

    • Strategy: Fund and disseminate research and reports that support the campaign’s narrative.
    • Tactics:
      • Think Tanks and Research Institutes: Establish or fund think tanks to produce research that aligns with the campaign’s goals.
      • White Papers and Reports: Publish detailed reports and white papers that provide in-depth analysis and support for the campaign’s positions.
      • Research Dissemination: Use media outlets, social media, and public events to disseminate research findings widely.

Case Study: Americans for Prosperity (AFP) and Healthcare Reform

Context:

  • Americans for Prosperity (AFP), funded by the Koch brothers, played a significant role in controlling the narrative against the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Strategies Used:

  1. Crafting and Disseminating Core Messages:

    • Execution: AFP framed the ACA as an example of government overreach and a threat to personal freedom and choice.
    • Outcome: This framing resonated with conservative values and helped rally opposition.

  2. Leveraging Media Outlets:

    • Execution: AFP placed op-eds in major newspapers, arranged media appearances for spokespeople, and issued press releases to promote their anti-ACA narrative.
    • Outcome: The campaign’s viewpoints were widely disseminated and discussed in mainstream media.

  3. Engaging Influencers and Thought Leaders:

    • Execution: AFP secured endorsements from conservative thought leaders and arranged for them to speak at public events and media appearances.
    • Outcome: These endorsements lent credibility to the campaign and broadened its appeal.

  4. Utilizing Social Media Platforms:

    • Execution: AFP ran targeted ads on Facebook and Twitter, promoting hashtags like HandsOffMyHealthcare, and developed viral content to increase engagement.
    • Outcome: The campaign reached a broad online audience, amplifying their message and mobilizing opposition.

  5. Suppressing Opposing Viewpoints:

    • Execution: AFP used negative campaigning and astroturfing tactics to discredit supporters of the ACA and flood online discussions with anti-ACA messages.
    • Outcome: This suppression helped maintain control over the narrative and limited the spread of opposing viewpoints.

  6. Creating and Promoting Research and Reports:

    • Execution: AFP funded think tanks to produce research critical of the ACA and published detailed reports that supported their narrative.
    • Outcome: These reports were widely disseminated, providing a veneer of academic legitimacy to the campaign’s positions.

Impact of Narrative Control

  1. Shaping Public Opinion

    • Perception Management: Effective narrative control shapes how the public perceives key issues, aligning public opinion with the campaign’s goals.
    • Emotional Resonance: Framing issues in emotionally resonant terms (e.g., freedom vs. government control) increases public engagement and support.

  2. Influence on Media Coverage

    • Agenda Setting: Controlling the narrative helps set the media agenda, determining which issues are covered and how they are framed.
    • Sympathetic Coverage: Media outlets that align with the campaign’s narrative are more likely to provide favorable coverage, further amplifying the message.

  3. Political and Legislative Impact

    • Policy Influence: By shaping public opinion and media coverage, narrative control exerts pressure on policymakers to align with the campaign’s goals.
    • Legislative Outcomes: Campaigns with effective narrative control are more likely to achieve favorable legislative outcomes, as policymakers respond to perceived public sentiment.

  4. Suppressing Opposition

    • Limiting Opposing Voices: Suppressing or discrediting opposing viewpoints helps maintain control over the narrative, limiting the influence of counter-arguments.
    • Polarization: This tactic can contribute to political polarization, as opposing viewpoints are marginalized and public discourse becomes more contentious.

Conclusion

Narrative control is a powerful tactic in astroturfing campaigns, enabling organizations to shape public opinion, influence media coverage, and achieve political goals. The Koch brothers and their network effectively employed strategies such as crafting core messages, leveraging media outlets, engaging influencers, utilizing social media, suppressing opposing viewpoints, and promoting supportive research to control the narrative around key issues like healthcare reform. Understanding these tactics is crucial for recognizing and countering manipulative efforts in the public policy arena.

Graph View

Backlinks