Luria separates three questions that document repositories often collapse.

Identity

What object is this?

Example:

ADR-019

Identity should remain stable enough that other knowledge can cite it.

Standing

What is this object's current state or authority?

Mechanically, standing is the document’s status:, a value from a vocabulary the scheme names in fields.status.vocabulary (ADR-085). One word in it — the scheme’s active:, Active by default — means in force. Every other value means out of force, and citing an out-of-force document is what the lint reports as a retired citation.

For a decision scheme, luria init ships:

Proposed
Active
Deferred
Superseded
Rejected

These are defaults, not laws. A scheme whose words are Kept and Dropped sets active: Kept and works the same way. The retirement pair is configurable too: retires_on names the status that means replaced (default Superseded) and successor the field that names the replacement (default superseded_by). A document carrying the retires_on status must fill that field — a superseded document with no superseded_by: is a violation (ADR-071).

For another domain, the vocabulary may mean something else entirely.

A paper’s Active may mean “worth retaining.” A recommendation’s Active may mean “currently advised.” Same spelling does not imply same semantics unless the record declares that shared vocabulary intentionally.

History

A superseded record is not deleted because:

no longer current ≠ never existed

Historical identity lets the record answer:

  • What did we believe then?
  • What replaced it?
  • Which implementation was justified by it?
  • Which incident led to its replacement?

Correction versus supersession

Luria’s own decision doctrine distinguishes two changes (ADR-019):

Correct the record

The choice is unchanged; the historical account is wrong or incomplete.

The document is revised in place, visibly: its version: is bumped and a history: entry says what the previous version claimed and why that was wrong. The lint checks that version: agrees with history:. A silent rewrite is what this rules out; being wrong out loud is not.

Supersede the choice

The choice itself changes.

Create a successor, set the old document’s status to Superseded, and name the successor in its superseded_by:.

The test for which case applies: would a reader who acted on the old version have done something different? If yes, the choice changed — supersede.

This keeps history epistemically honest.

Provisional identity

A distributed workflow may not have a safe global serialization point when a branch first creates an entry.

For schemes configured with merge allocation, Luria can issue visibly temporary identities and later concretize them where merges serialize (ADR-049).

The important principle is not the spelling of temporary codes. It is that the record can represent:

provisional identity

without lying that global order is already known.

See Use merge-time identity allocation.