The case
The repeated objection (A11’s CASE B). An objection costs 15 to reconstruct and answer. After it has appeared twice it is filed, with its strongest form, the answer and the answer’s assumptions, for 25. Each later encounter costs 3 to retrieve and check. Over three further encounters: 3 × 15 = 45 against 25 + 3 × 3 = 34. Filing saves 11. The break-even is n > 25/(15 − 3) ≈ 2.1, so three uses.
The argument nobody reuses (A11’s CASE A). Filed for 20, reconstructible for 10, never needed again. “The record’s storage was successful. Its amortization failed.”
What it can show
That filing an addressed objection can pay, which is the record’s reason for coding recurring moves (ADR-032), and that an anchor can work as CLAIM-182 says and still not be worth making.
What it cannot show
A11: “That the saved effort improves the argument’s truth, or that the objection remains answered when new evidence arrives.”