Hyzen, A., Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Kulig, M. & Paulussen, S. (2026). Epistemic welfare and algorithmic recommender systems: overcoming the epistemic crisis in the digitalized public sphere. Communication Theory 36(1): 46–57. doi:10.1093/ct/qtaf018.
Skimmed 2026-10-21 (NOTE-1035), through a fetch tool; quotes unchecked.
Key takeaways
- Epistemic welfare: “creating and maintaining the conditions and capabilities for individuals’ epistemic agency in the public sphere”.
- Stages of capability. Literacies “turn availability into access”, and critical skills “turn access into knowledge acquisition”.
- Transparency is not enough. Transparency duties, which are all the EU AI Act asks of media recommenders, are judged insufficient.
Why this is here
A25: it “comes particularly close to our conjunction of legibility and operational availability”; a person may be able to evaluate information yet lack access to it. Bears on CLAIM-403 and TERM-064.