Why it is a question

THEORY-187, narrowed on 2026-10-19, holds the depth law of Saxe, McClelland and Ganguli (LIT-864) for the start the exact theory covers: whitened inputs and initial weights on the decoupled set, balanced across layers. There each mode is a scalar, and the plateau and the iteration count follow by integration. Until that date THEORY-187’s promote_when asked whether the same law holds from starts off the decoupled set. At the owner’s direction, from the promotion audit’s batch 027 (ADR-047), the THEORY was narrowed and promoted on the exact case, and the condition moved here unchanged.

It is open because off the decoupled set the modes couple, the scalar reduction fails, and the paper’s account of random orthogonal starts is an argument from the isometry of the product of layers, with one MNIST experiment (Fig. 6A, NOTE-667). It refines QUESTION-039’s question of what sets the moment at which a network acquires a structure.

What would answer it

The condition formerly on THEORY-187, unchanged: a derivation, or a controlled measurement across depths, showing that deep linear networks started off the decoupled set behave the same way, with learning time, counted in iterations at the stable step size, bounded in depth when the initial end-to-end gain on every mode is of order one, and growing as a power of 1/ε when it is ε. That means random orthogonal or random small weights, not aligned with the task’s singular vectors. More runs from decoupled starts cannot settle it, since there the result is already exact.