The question
QUESTION-118 asks how persistence is settled when several later collectives each continue an earlier one in a different respect. Before that comes whether such plural succession is possible at all without numerical identity branching. This question asks that.
The answer
CLAIM-328, Active, answers yes, as an existence claim grounded on CASE-105. When a collective’s franchise, civic role, interpersonal transmission, and narrative and place come apart, as at the Senators’ relocation, several later collectives each succeed it in one respect: the Twins by the league’s legal succession, the expansion Senators by the city’s place in the league, the 2005 Nationals by claim to the city’s history. These are plural successor relations. None of them, and not the earlier collective, has to branch in numerical identity.
It rests on one documented case, with no data on how supporters divided. Which successor relation, if any, is the earlier collective persisting, and what criterion decides it, remain QUESTION-118’s.