Source
Di Biagio and Rovelli (2021), LIT-1666, read in full in NOTE-1226, §§2.2–2.3. The contradiction “follows from inappropriately mixing contexts” (p. 8), and “Wigner will always agree with his Friend about the value of L_S once he too interacts with them” (p. 10).
Where the evidence stands
What the paper argues is THEORY-1081, Active, which this entry extends. The
decohered case is credited to others, agreement between observers is argued
from one entangled state’s correlation (THEORY-1080), and an agent reasoning
about an experiment on himself “has not been done within RQM yet”. THEORY-621,
Proposed, carries the same gap for Rovelli’s single-friend rule from another
source. The promote_when above is THEORY-1081’s condition before the twenty-fourth status review promoted it, carried here unchanged, because it asks what would make the thesis true and not what the source says.