Source

LIT-667. Filed by the promotion audit’s narrowing-loss sweep (batch 066, ADR-047 v4) on 2026-10-20, to carry the wider claim that the narrowing of THEORY-117 dropped. THEORY-117 is Active and is this THEORY’s evidence; this one stays Proposed.

What was actually shown

In an n × n grid of two concepts with k combinations seen per value, ResNet-50s trained from scratch fit the seen pairs and fail on unseen ones; four times the data of the same combinations leaves 60–80% drops, while seeing a larger share of the combinations closes the gap, and the features pass from spurious to decodable to linearly factored as coverage grows. Pretrained DINO, DINOv2 and CLIP features are partly factored. THEORY-117 states the measured result, with its oracle checkpoint selection, and the re-derived theorem that exactly factored embeddings of every unseen pair are fixed by seen pairs connecting every value. The authors draw the general conclusion, about vision models and about what drives compositional generalization, from this one design.

What would settle it

The promote_when is inherited from THEORY-117’s before it was narrowed, and QUESTION-207 asks the same question.

What this does not say

It is not a claim about how much data a practitioner needs, and it says nothing about generative models. The measurements chose checkpoints on the test pairs, so they bound what is possible rather than what honest selection reaches; this THEORY’s general form needs that gap closed.