Source
Assran et al. (2022), LIT-231, §§3–5 and Appendix C, read in NOTE-850. The class-wide prior and its explanation of the degradation joint-embedding methods show on long-tailed data are the paper’s thesis; NOTE-850 rates both halves weak beyond MSN and SwAV and beyond batches of two to eight classes.
What is asserted, and by whom
The thesis has two halves. The prior: every volume-maximizing joint-embedding objective, not only those that state it, prefers equal-sized clusters (NOTE-850, C3 and C4, both weak: VICReg by Proposition 2 for a simplified loss with an informal last step, SimCLR by a cited equivalence). The effect: that prior is why these methods lose semantic transfer on class-imbalanced data, natural long tails included (C7, weak, inferred from batches of two to eight classes). Assran et al. assert both.
What the record holds toward it
- THEORY-306 (Active): the explicit prior in MSN’s loss and SwAV’s equipartition, and 11 to 18 points of ImageNet linear accuracy lost by SimCLR, MSN and VICReg with two to eight classes per batch, against under one for MAE and data2vec, one run per cell.
- Matching the prior to the class distribution helps on long-tailed pretraining (C6, moderate), which fits the thesis without testing it, since the gain was obtained with the true or a guessed class prior.
What would confirm or reject it
A derivation or measurement of the prior for VICReg and SimCLR as trained, and the imbalance effect on naturally long-tailed data with seeds, confirm it; learned partitions that track unequal classes as well as an instance-based method’s reject it for that method. QUESTION-171 asks the same thing as a question; this entry is the answer Assran et al. propose.