Voices — Whose voice a CLAIM is in, within the record’s own deliberation. Not whether the record believes it, which is the status: the two vary independently, and the mismatched pairs are the information (ADR-032).
Supposed — assumed for the sake of the argument, so everything resting on it is conditional on it. May scope a whole work, as an independently warranted agent scopes the will paper.
3 of 547 CLAIM documents. Back to the full index.
| # | Title | Summary | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLAIM-009 | Pragmatic judgements may be formally contextual: their context-relative distributions may admit no global extension once direct context effects are accounted for | A24’s “contextuality hypothesis, which remains open”, and A30’s H2. The manuscript keeps it as a possibility its empirical programme tests (§3, §9, §10) and disclaims any presumption that it holds. | Proposed |
| CLAIM-020 | A translation’s quality is the number of formal and semantic constraints it preserves | Hofstadter’s starting criterion, as A4 reports it, and the Pareto- frontier picture of fidelity around it. Refuted in the same reply by the mother’s translation. | Rejected |
| CLAIM-080 | The agent is independently warranted: the account asks how a given agent’s practical efficacy is organized, not what makes something an agent | The supposition that scopes the whole paper (Sections 1, 2, 7.4). Everything resting on it is conditional on it; Northstar is assumed to be an agent “for purposes of analysis”. | Active |