The inference

Wang, Sadrzadeh, Abramsky and Cervantes (LIT-851) report signalling measures for 90 systems of ambiguous nouns and verbs. CLAIM-125’s version 1: “69 of the 90 systems signal” and “34 signal enough that they cannot be contextual at all”. “So for language data signalling is the typical case, not an edge case, and an extension to signalling data is not optional.” CLAIM-127 repeats the count.

Critical questions

  • Would the evidence be expected if the hypothesis were false? Yes, and this is the question that fails. The plug-in signalling Δ̂ is “positive in expectation even when the true marginals are equal” (CLAIM-235). In a rank-2 system with no signalling and one occurrence per context, Δ̂ takes only the values 0, 2 and 4, with expectation 2. NOTE-654: “51 of 90 systems have Δ exactly 0, 2 or 4, and 18 have err(Δ) = 1.41. Both patterns suggest one or a few occurrences per context.”
  • Does it tell the hypothesis apart from its rivals? No. Sampling noise from one or a few occurrences predicts the same counts as signalling in the population.
  • Does the measure measure what it is said to? Not for the conclusion’s population. NOTE-654: the probabilities “are relative frequencies of interpretations that the authors assigned by hand to BNC and ukWaC occurrences. No annotation protocol or agreement is reported.” CLAIM-125 spoke of “language data”, and the pragmatic thesis is about judgements.

Verdict

Rejected. CLAIM-235: “CLAIM-125’s ‘not optional’ may well be right. Its stated evidence does not carry it.” CLAIM-235 undercuts the inference: the upward bias of plug-in signalling from few occurrences is a claim about the subject matter. The argument does not say signalling is rare, nor that LIT-851’s Proposition 1 is wrong (THEORY-177); it is about the counts read off the appendix.

CLAIM-125’s version 2 already conceded the point. It reads the counts as weak and rests “not optional” on NOTE-235’s reading of LIT-264 and on CLAIM-127’s routes to signalling. This argument records the version 1 inference that failed.

Filed 2026-10-28 by the ADR-061 migration, from CLAIM-235.