The case

A person’s gut hosts a microbial community that produces short-chain fatty acids, bile-acid derivatives, indoles and proteins such as ClpB, which mimics a host satiety peptide. These signal through gut hormones, the immune system and the vagus nerve. In rodents:

  • colonizing germ-free animals changes their stress responses;
  • transplanting microbiota from depressed humans partly transfers depressive-like behaviour.

In humans:

  • some probiotic trials reduce subjective stress in healthy volunteers;
  • strains with strong animal records have failed in trials;
  • delivered microbial metabolites (propionate) acutely reduce food intake.

The details and grades are in NOTE-706 and NOTE-703.

What it can show

  • Drive from below that is not a single part. The source is a community whose own drive profile (TERM-051) is likely diffuse.
  • Drive that changes with time. Hunger and mood vary, and the microbiome’s contribution varies with diet and state.
  • Membership in question. The holobiont reading (LIT-709) and the threshold criterion (CLAIM-157) bear on whether these microbes are part of the person.

As a documented case it shows only what the evidence does: routes, and causal effects in animals. That the owner’s own hunger and mood are driven this way is the claim (CLAIM-166), not the case.