Klaus R. Scherer (2009), Cognition and Emotion 23(7):1307–1351 — DOI-10.1080/02699930902928969
Key takeaways
Registered, not read. From the abstract:
- “Emotion is conceptualised as an emergent, dynamic process based on an individual’s subjective appraisal of significant events.”
- The component process model is sketched and compared with its rivals, and recent evidence for it is reviewed. “Special emphasis is given to the dynamic aspect of emotion processes, in particular the sequence of appraisal checks and the synchronisation of response systems, as well as the capacity of the model to predict individual differences in emotional responding.”
The model itself, its four appraisal objectives, its sequential stimulus evaluation checks, the feeling component as monitor, and emotion as component synchronization, is read in the companion paper (LIT-1451, NOTE-1113).
Standing in the record
Filed on 2026-10-23 for the record’s proposal that hedonic valence is one ordering serving as the negotiation’s potential (CLAIM-440, TERM-076). What this paper would add over its companion is the empirical side: whatever measures of response synchronization the evidence review uses. That is what QUESTION-268 needs. The companion gives none. It says that “all we can currently measure is the individual’s verbal account of a consciously experienced feeling”.
No instruction for machine-learning practice; nothing here belongs in the anthology.