Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A. & Rust, M. C. (1993). European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26.
Not read. The summary is drawn from the abstract or from what the work is standardly cited for. A reading should check it first.
Why this is here
The model Biel (NOTE-1299) and Reimer et al. (NOTE-1251) use, and behind Pettigrew’s recategorization (LIT-1408).
Read in its place
The work cannot be read here, so the record holds it at second hand.
Dovidio et al. 2009 (NOTE-1286) restate the model the 1993 paper set out: four representations (one group, two subgroups within one group, two groups, separate individuals) with distinct consequences, and the dual identity as a second form of recategorization. They extend it to helping. They do not cite the 1993 paper. Missing still: its account of how the contact hypothesis’s conditions work through recategorization, and its laboratory and field evidence.