Philip Pettit (2007), Ethics 117(2):171–201 — DOI-10.1086/510695
Key takeaways
Registered, not read. The argument is read in Pettit’s 2017 chapter (LIT-718), which restates it. Those are the conditions of a significant choice, the capacity to make a normative judgment about the options, and control over acting on that judgment. It argues that a corporation meets them because it must form a mind of its own, not borrow one from any mechanical aggregation of its members’ votes.
Standing in the record
Filed on 2026-10-05 at the owner’s request. The account is THEORY-139.