nucleation

LIT-992: How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions

1 min read

Properties3
StatusUnavailable — filed 2026-10-12 from the owner's papers-feed, not read. A lawful full text was sought on 2026-10-14 and not reached. OpenAlex reports it closed and lists a HAL record (hal-04076959), but the HAL API shows it is a notice with no file deposited. Unpaywall reports no open copy. The Nature Reviews Neuroscience page offers only paid access. Europe PMC holds the PubMed record (PMID 36997716) with no full text. Searches for a preprint, an accepted manuscript or a copy on the authors' pages found none, and Goethe University Frankfurt's repository search found no deposit. It stays Unavailable until a copy is supplied. The claim in the body, that it sets plant control against coupled-dynamics control at the motor scale for QUESTION-054, is from the abstract.
Version2
Tagsbehavioral-integration, neuroscience, embodied-cognition

Graph View

Mareike Floegel, Johannes Kasper, Pascal Perrier and Christian A. Kell (2023), Nature Reviews Neuroscience 24(5), 313–329.

Filed for QUESTION-054: it sets plant control, a controller apart from what it controls, against movement that emerges from coupled dynamics. That is the question’s split between a governing level and interaction, at the motor scale.

Seeded from the abstract, not a reading. A reading should check the claim above first.

Backlinks