Lines of inquiry — A named line of the record’s own argument, so that a line can be set aside as a whole and what depends on it can be found. Retracting a line is a status change on its members, never a deletion (ADR-032).
Authenticity and concordance — what makes a will-organization the agent’s own, and normativity across the scales an agent spans. Set aside on 2026-10-05 as future work.
4 of 371 QUESTION documents. Back to the full index.
| # | Title | Summary | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUESTION-007 v2 | What grounds normativity across agents that share an environment and a level of organization? | The owner’s question at U75: authenticity, if it gives normativity at all, gives it downward from an agent to its constituents, and not sideways between peers. Set aside with the authenticity line. | Deferred |
| QUESTION-011 v2 | What makes a will-organization the agent’s own, rather than merely effective within it? | The ownership question. The authenticity line was built to answer it and was set aside with it at the audit of 2026-10-05; the paper now disclaims it (CLAIM-022). | Deferred |
| QUESTION-057 | Can the integration that marks a will-organization as the agent’s own be detected apart from the agent’s own avowal that her commitments are hers? | Filed in the fourth synthesis pass to give readings no question asked for a place in the argument. It bears on CLAIM-016 and QUESTION-011. THEORY-074 answers it in part; the body gives each one’s limit. Deferred with its line. | Deferred |
| QUESTION-068 | Would settling whose a will-organization is settle the agent’s accountability for what it does, or does accountability need conditions, such as normative competence and avoidability, that ownership does not supply? | Filed in the fourth synthesis pass to give readings no question asked for a place in the argument. It bears on QUESTION-011, CLAIM-022 and CLAIM-016. THEORY-118, THEORY-119, THEORY-122 and THEORY-147 answer it in part; the body gives each one’s limit. Deferred with its line. | Deferred |