Topics — What a work is about. Nucleation holds whatever reading the owner files here, whether or not an Anthology of the SOTA topic could also hold it; instruction for ML practice belongs to the anthology (ADR-048). The words are seeded from the clusters the reading-time triage of 2026-09-25 found, and grow by decision.
Free will — free will and volition, as philosophy and as science — compatibilism and its rivals, manipulation and responsibility, and the neuroscience of voluntary action such as the readiness potential (group: philosophy; ADR-025).
2 of 371 QUESTION documents. Back to the full index.
| # | Title | Summary | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUESTION-068 | Would settling whose a will-organization is settle the agent’s accountability for what it does, or does accountability need conditions, such as normative competence and avoidability, that ownership does not supply? | Filed in the fourth synthesis pass to give readings no question asked for a place in the argument. It bears on QUESTION-011, CLAIM-022 and CLAIM-016. THEORY-118, THEORY-119, THEORY-122 and THEORY-147 answer it in part; the body gives each one’s limit. Deferred with its line. | Deferred |
| QUESTION-364 | When an agent’s own processes revise its will-organization, what makes the result the continuation of that agent’s will rather than a replacement authored by something else, and how can a history of authorization count when the standards for reading authorization are themselves revised? | One of the four “hardest problems” A29 listed in its synthesis of the exchange “Analyze nucleation concepts” (2026-10-31), under “organizational identity and authorship”. A29 cited QUESTION-284 for it, which asks something else (whether constraints characterize or constitute). The nearest held question, QUESTION-118, asks the collective form without will or authorization. This is the will-organization form. | Open |