nucleation

CLAIM-109: In translation the pragmatic frame does not merely select a description of meaning but participates in determining which meaning becomes actual

1 min read

Properties8
StatusSuperseded — by CLAIM-009 — Pragmatic judgements may be formally contextual: their context-relative distributions may admit no global extension once direct context effects are accounted for
Rolethesis
Warrantinterpretive
Tagscontextuality, philosophy-of-language
Linepragmatic-transport
Argued byARG-002 — Interpretive framings change a reader's state as non-commuting measurements do, so the frame participates in determining which meaning becomes actual
UsesTERM-016 — frame, as a pragmatic frame of reference
Rendered intodocs/arguments-by-conclusion.md

Graph View

The claim

A21: “Translation can be understood as a context-dependent realization of communicative potential, in which the pragmatic frame does not merely select a description of meaning but can participate in determining which meaning becomes actual in the interpretive interaction.” Translations would be “different interventions that actualize different possibilities latent in the original’s interpretive structure”.

Why it was replaced

Its argument is ARG-002, undercut by CLAIM-041. A27: “Here I would actually moderate something I said earlier.” Its conclusion was not refuted; it was demoted to a hypothesis (CLAIM-009). The actualization language does not appear in the manuscript.

Backlinks