Oliver Scott Curry, Matthew Jones Chesters, Caspar J. Van Lissa (2019), Journal of Research in Personality 78:106–124; preprint PsyArXiv 42vbn (2018) — DOI-10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008
Key takeaways
- A seven-subscale questionnaire built from morality-as-cooperation’s domains recovers seven factors on its Relevance items in UK and US samples, where the MFQ does not recover its five.
- It does not test whether anything outside cooperation is moralized: it has no such items, and the MFQ’s purity items, which are such items, are rated morally relevant.
Standing in the record
Filed on 2026-10-02 at the owner’s request, with the rest of the morality-as-cooperation programme (ADR-018). The sixty-society paper (LIT-047) cites this one in its Reply as the test of the seven-factor structure, and NOTE-034’s lineage paragraph names it.
NOTE-412 is the close reading of 2026-10-02, and it placed the work Proposed. It does not move LIT-047. NOTE-034 found that test weakly diagnostic because its codebook defined the behaviours in virtue terms and coded no comparison domain. The questionnaire repeats both features. Its items describe the seven behaviours in virtue terms (“acted heroically”, “showed love for their family”), and it contains no non-cooperative item. So the seven-factor structure shows that people distinguish seven kinds of cooperation, not that morality is confined to them.
Its MFQ studies do bear on the purity objection, and they bear against the theory as stated in LIT-503. Purity items are rated morally relevant at about the level of the loyalty and authority items. The authors concede that this “appear[s] to contradict MAC’s prediction”. They meet it by saying purity is not a coherent domain, and by proposing that sympathy and disgust may be proximate mechanisms serving several cooperation problems at once (manuscript p. 40 and endnote xv). Fitouchi, André and Baumard (LIT-101) give the record’s worked version of that reply. The Turkish validation (LIT-513) is the independent replication of the factor structure.