Topics — What a work is about. Nucleation holds whatever reading the owner files here, whether or not an Anthology of the SOTA topic could also hold it; instruction for ML practice belongs to the anthology (ADR-048). The words are seeded from the clusters the reading-time triage of 2026-09-25 found, and grow by decision.
Society and governance — law, politics, policy, security and institutions — court records, doctrine, democratic theory, information operations.
4 of 52 ARG documents. Back to the full index.
| # | Title | Summary | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARG-001 | Moving severity classification, or adding a business-critical override, changes outcomes without changing the rule, so precedence, jurisdiction and suspension come apart | The constructed line of support (Sections 5.3–5.5). Independent of ARG-003: undercutting the analogy leaves this standing. | Active |
| ARG-003 v2 | In the Dual State ordinary norms governed conduct while a prerogative order held authority over whether they bound, so a constraint can govern conduct without governing its own authority | The historical line of support for CLAIM-086 (Section 5.6). Undercut except in its structural respect (CLAIM-032). | Active |
| ARG-009 | Northstar-A and Northstar-B differ only in escalation authority and act differently, so escalation authority helps govern efficacy | The institutional line of support for CLAIM-027 (Sections 5.1–5.2), an interventionist contrast (THEORY-138). Conditional on the supposed agent. Two of its critical questions are unanswered. | Proposed |
| ARG-052 | Van Lange and Bergmann’s model of intergroup cooperation does not establish that cooperation within groups and the coexistence of groups are distinct targets that can trade off: it shows that the processes building in-group cooperation can fuel conflict between groups, and says nothing on whether groups persist, go extinct or are owed impartial concern | CLAIM-547 was filed citing Van Lange and Bergmann (2026) as the evidence the synthesis offers for its human case, before the review was read. Read in NOTE-1537, the review carries one link in the claim and not the claim. Rejected as an inference to the claim as titled. The link it does carry is recorded as corroboration (THEORY-1352 corroborates CLAIM-547), and the review is no longer among the claim’s grounds. | Rejected |